Introduction
Method
Results
Discussion
KEY WORDS
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Pediatric Health CareReferences
- Beyond Tuskegee—Vaccine distrust and everyday racism.New England Journal of Medicine. 2021; 384: e12
- Announcements versus conversations to improve HPV vaccination coverage: A randomized trial.Pediatrics. 2017; 139: 1-9
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019a). Dr. Todd Wolynn describes how he recommends HPV vaccine. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/wOKV4eEcTzU
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019b). How many cancers are linked to HPV each year? Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/hpv/statistics/cases.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019c). Talking to parents about HPV vaccine. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hpv/hcp/for-hcp-tipsheet-hpv.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019d). HPV vaccine schedule and dosing. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/hpv/hcp/schedules-recommendations.html
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases. (2018). National immunization survey – Teen (NIS-Teen). Retrieved fromhttps://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/data-sources-and-methods/data-sources/national-immunization-survey-teen-nis-teen
- Primary care team- and clinic level factors affecting HPV vaccine uptake.Vaccine. 2017; 35: 4540-4547
- ‘There's always next year’: Primary care team and parent perspectives on the human papillomavirus vaccine.Human Vaccines and Immunotherapeutics. 2020; 16: 1814-1823
- Association of both consistency and strength of self-reported clinician recommendation for HPV vaccination and HPV vaccine uptake among 11- to 12-year-old children.Vaccine. 2017; 35: 6122-6128
- Importance of a team approach to recommending the human papillomavirus vaccination.Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2018; 30: 368-372
- Quality of physician communication about human papillomavirus vaccine: Findings from a national survey.Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. 2015; 24: 1673-1679
Healthy People 2030. (n.d.). Increase the proportion of adolescents who get recommended doses of the HPV vaccine—IID08. Retrieved fromhttps://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/vaccination/increase-proportion-adolescents-who-get-recommended-doses-hpv-vaccine-iid-08
- HPV vaccine delivery practices by primary care physicians.Pediatrics. 2019; 144: 1-14
- The improvement guide: A practical approach to enhancing organizational performance.2nd ed. Wiley, Chichester, United Kingdom2009
- SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.BMJ Quality and Safety. 2016; 25: 986-992
Oregon Health Authority. (2020). Oregon adolescent immunization rates. Retrieved fromhttps://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/PREVENTIONWELLNESS/VACCINESIMMUNIZATION/Pages/researchteen.aspx
- Adherence to ACIP recommendation for human papillomavirus vaccine among US adolescent girls.Journal of Community Health. 2017; 42: 385-389
- Evaluation of the implementation of a multicomponent intervention to improve health care provider communication about human papillomavirus vaccination.Academic Pediatrics. 2018; 18: 882-888
- Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on routine pediatric vaccine ordering and administration—United States, 2020.MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2020; 69: 591-593
- Human papillomavirus 9-valent vaccine for cancer prevention: A systematic review of the available evidence.Epidemiology and Infection. 2017; 145: 1962-1982
- Pediatrician-parent conversations about human papillomavirus vaccination: An analysis of audio recordings.Journal of Adolescent Health. 2017; 61: 246-251
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
This project was reviewed by the university and project site Institutional Review Boards and determined to be quality improvement and not human research (IRB No. 00022169).
Conflicts of interest: None to report.