Café au lait macules (CALMs) are hyperpigmented, flat skin lesions that arise from more active, pigment-producing melanocytes in the epidermis. They may be present at birth but may also grow in number and size over time. Most CALMs are benign and when identified, the greatest concern is often cosmetic. There are, however, several genetic syndromes associated with CALMs that should prompt referral. This article provides an overview of CALMs, followed by a summary of several diagnoses associated with these macules ranging from the most common, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF 1), to less common ring chromosome syndromes. The associated gene(s), pattern of inheritance, incidence, presenting symptoms and findings, diagnosis, surveillance, and management for these conditions will be described.
CAFÉ AU LAIT MACULES
Flat, pigmented birth marks are typically described as
café au lait (French for
coffee with milk) spots or macules, but other names that appear in the literature include
giraffe, coast of California, and
coast of Maine spots. These lesions are light brown in color but can vary in pigment. These primary, de novo (new or spontaneous), irregularly shaped skin lesions can occur anywhere on the body but appear most frequently on the trunk and extremities and least commonly on the face. Some have smooth, well-defined borders and others have more-jagged edges (
Figures 1 and
2). They arise from increased melanin production by melanocytes in the basal layer (stratum basale) of the epidermis. There is no increase in the number of melanocytes in the area; the dendritic pigment-producing cells are simply more active and thus manufacture more melanin, resulting in darker pigment (
). Café au lait macules can range in size from a few millimeters to several centimeters (>20 cm;
,
,
Shah, 2010The diagnostic and clinical significance of café-au-lait macules.
), and the size and shape of the macule have no greater or lesser significance or health implication.
Café au lait macules are common in children. Most are present at birth and are difficult to appreciate (Wood's lamp may improve visibility), or they may emerge in the first few months or years of life. They can increase in number and size (in proportion to growth) over time (
). Incidence ranges are typically quoted as 5% among White individuals and 15% among individuals of African descent. More specifically, the incidence of one CALM ranges between 0.3% and 27%, depending on age and race/ethnicity (
,
Shah, 2010The diagnostic and clinical significance of café-au-lait macules.
,
). In newborns, CALMs are seen in 0.3% of Whites and 18% of those who identify as Black. Among school-age children, rates increase to as high as 13% of Whites and 27% of Blacks (
). Most individuals present with one or two CALMs, and 1% to 14% of the population have three or more (
Ben-Shachar et al., 2017- Ben-Shachar S.
- Dubov T.
- Toledano-Alhadef H.
- Mashiah J.
- Sprecher E.
- Constantini S.
- Messiaen L.M.
Predicting neurofibromatosis type 1 risk among children with isolated cafe-au-lait macules.
,
,
Shah, 2010The diagnostic and clinical significance of café-au-lait macules.
).
Most CALMs are benign and of no clinical significance. However, there are associated genetic conditions, some of which carry increased predisposition to cancers (
) and/or other health problems. The condition associated with CALMs for which most providers are familiar is NF 1. Other syndromes associated with multiple CALMs include other RASopathies such as Legius syndrome, Watson syndrome, and Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines, and others such as McCune–Albright syndrome, ring chromosome syndromes, and constitutional mismatch repair deficiency. An overview of each of the conditions for which the presence of CALMs may enter the differential diagnosis is discussed. Additionally, the genetics/inheritance, incidence, diagnostic criteria, diagnostic testing, and available treatments for these conditions are summarized to ensure that pediatric providers know when and why genetic referral is indicated.
Most CALMs are benign and of no clinical significance.
NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1
NF 1 is an autosomal dominant, multisystem condition caused by a change in the
NF1 gene and, rarely (5%), a microdeletion located on the long arm of chromosome locus 17q11.2. This gene encodes neurofibromin, a protein that downregulates cellular proto-oncogenes and, as such, acts as a tumor suppressor. Variants in
NF1 lead to production of nonfunctional neurofibromin that cannot regulate cell growth and division. Approximately 50% of individuals inherit the genetic change from a parent, and in the other half they occur sporadically (de novo). The condition has high penetrance and variability in the expression of clinical features. The incidence of NF 1 is 1 in 3,000 to 4,000 live births worldwide (
Johnson et al., 2013- Johnson K.J.
- Hussain I.
- Williams K.
- Santens R.
- Mueller N.L.
- Gutmann D.H.
Development of an international internet-based neurofibromatosis type 1 patient registry.
,
,
).
Café au lait macules are the hallmark feature of NF 1, and multiple CALMs (≥6 greater than 5 mm) raises suspicion for the diagnosis. Other findings that evolve over time include axillary and inguinal skin-fold freckling, 1- to 3-mm pigmented macules resembling CALMs (Crowe's sign), usually by age 5 years; multiple cutaneous and subcutaneous neurofibromas that can form along the long peripheral nerves; iris Lisch nodules; and choroidal freckling. Plexiform neurofibromas occur in approximately 30% of individuals and are believed to be congenital, internal, and a significant cause of mortality among affected individuals (
).
It is unclear why learning disabilities are present in 30% to 70% of individuals with NF1. Overall, compared with their siblings, individuals with NF 1 have lower IQ scores but are not intellectually disabled (IQ < 70;
). Some show behaviors consistent with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and others, autism and social impairment (
Garg et al., 2013- Garg S.
- Green J.
- Leadbitter K.
- Emsley R.
- Lehtonen A.
- Evans D.G.
- Huson S.M.
Neurofibromatosis type 1 and autism spectrum disorder.
).
More serious problems that occur less frequently include optic nerve and other central nervous system gliomas (optic pathway gliomas and glioblastoma) and peripheral nerve sheath tumors (spinal neurofibromas, plexiform neurofibromas, and malignant nerve sheath tumors). Skeletal abnormalities include risk for scoliosis, sphenoid wing dysplasia, anterior chest wall deformities (pectus excavatum and pectus carinatum), and tibial dysplasia. Vasculopathies including renal stenosis, cerebral aneurysm, and risk for hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke also occur (
Gutmann et al., 2017- Gutmann D.H.
- Ferner R.E.
- Listernick R.H.
- Korf B.R.
- Wolters P.L.
- Johnson K.J.
Neurofibromatosis type 1.
,
). The NIH diagnostic criteria for NF 1 is used to make a clinical diagnosis (
Box 1). Although available, genetic testing is rarely needed to confirm a diagnosis of NF 1 and is typically reserved for children for whom there is high index of suspicion in the absence of diagnostic criteria or for whom a diagnosis of Legius syndrome is considered.
BOX 1NIH Diagnostic Criteria for NF 1 (1988)Clinical diagnosis is based on presence of two of the following:
- •
Six or more café au lait macules over 5 mm in diameter in pre-pubertal individuals and over 15 mm in greatest diameter in post-pubertal individuals
- •
Two or more neurofibromas of any type or one plexiform neurofibroma
- •
Freckling in the axillary or inguinal regions
- •
Two or more Lisch nodules (iris hamartomas)
- •
Optic glioma
- •
A distinctive osseous lesion such as sphenoid dysplasia or thinning of long bone cortex, with or without pseudarthrosis
- •
First-degree relative (parent, sibling, or offspring) with NF 1 by the above criteria
Note.
Recommendations to revise these criteria have been made to include the addition of other clinical features such as choroidal freckling, nevus anemicus, unidentified bright objects, and availability of molecular testing for NF 1 unknown at the time of the Consensus Conference (,
,
Parrozzani et al., 2015- Parrozzani R.
- Clementi M.
- Frizziero L.
- Miglionico G.
- Perrini P.
- Cavarzeran F.
- Midena E.
In vivo detection of choroidal abnormalities related to NF1: Feasibility and comparison with standard NIH diagnostic criteria in pediatric patients.
,
Tadini et al., 2014- Tadini G.
- Milani D.
- Menni F.
- Pezzani L.
- Sabatini C.
- Esposito S.
Is it time to change the neurofibromatosis 1 diagnostic criteria?.
). Source: .
Children born into a family with affected individuals can usually be diagnosed by 1 year of age because the criteria of family history has been met when multiple CALMs are identified. For those without a family history, about half will meet diagnostic criteria by 1 year of age, and almost all meet criteria by age 8 years (
). Pending presentation of a second symptom (typically axillary freckling and neurofibromas), children are typically followed by a geneticist or other skin specialist familiar with genetic CALM syndromes. Annual ophthalmology evaluations are recommended to screen for optic pathway glioma.
Once a diagnosis of NF1 is confirmed, treatment rests with ongoing surveillance of growth and development, including pubertal changes and the presentation of ophthalmologic, skeletal, neurologic, cardiac, and endocrine findings, to ensure appropriate screening and timely specialist referral. There are published guidelines to guide longitudinal surveillance, the most recent of which was published in 2008 by the American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Genetics (
Hersh, 2008American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Genetics
Health supervision for children with neurofibromatosis.
). Growth parameters including height, weight, and head circumference and pubertal development should be followed closely. Macrocephaly and hydrocephalus can be associated with tumor development, and delayed or precocious puberty may develop secondary to a pituitary hypothalamic lesion (
Ferner et al., 2007- Ferner R.E.
- Huson S.M.
- Thomas N.
- Moss C.
- Willshaw H.
- Evans D.G.
- Kirby A.
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1.
). Blood pressure should be monitored to assess for secondary hypertension related to NF 1 vasculopathy (renal artery stenosis) and pheochromocytoma. Developmental assessments are important, as is referral to a neurologist should neurologic deficits be suspected. Individual educational and behavioral concerns must be addressed through school and supplemental services. Ophthalmologic evaluations including slit lamp examination are needed annually to age 8 years and less frequently in older children and adults. Skeletal surveillance includes monitoring for signs of tibial dysplasia and scoliosis. Tibial dysplasia (anterolateral bow) increases risk for fracture, tibial pseudoarthrosis, and limb length discrepancy. Dystrophic scoliosis is most common, but nondystrophic scoliosis can develop.
Diagnostic studies such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be prescribed if there are clinical signs or symptoms that warrant further study. If malignant tumors are identified, surgical and medical oncologists familiar with molecular oncogenic mechanisms and inherent tumor predispositions should provide treatment. In addition, parents of children with a confirmed diagnosis of NF 1 should have skin and ophthalmologic examinations and genetic counseling to discuss inheritance, and recurrence risk should be provided.
WATSON SYNDROME
Watson syndrome (CALMs with pulmonary stenosis) is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder with clinical and molecular overlap with NF 1 and, thus, is considered a variant of NF 1. Individuals with a Watson syndrome phenotype appear to have nontruncating
NF1 variants more frequently than the truncating variants found in other individuals with NF 1 (
Ben-Shachar et al., 2013- Ben-Shachar S.
- Constantini S.
- Hallevi H.
- Sach E.K.
- Upadhyaya M.
- Evans G.D.
- Huson S.M.
Increased rate of missense/in-frame mutations in individuals with NF1-related pulmonary stenosis: A novel genotype-phenotype correlation.
).
In addition to CALMs, Watson syndrome is characterized by pulmonic stenosis (52%), intellectual disability (68% with borderline or reduced intelligence), and short stature (80%), a key discriminating factor. Additionally, approximately one-half of patients have relative macrocephaly (absolute macrocephaly is seen in NF 1) and Lisch nodules (58%), and approximately one-third have neurofibromas (
Allanson et al., 1991- Allanson E.
- Upadhyaya M.
- Watson G.H.
- Partington M.
- MacKenzie A.
- Lahey D.
- Huson S.M.
Watson syndrome: Is it a subtype of type 1 neurofibromatosis?.
,
). Affected individuals meet NIH diagnostic criteria for NF 1, but associated features of NF 1 and its complications are unusual (
Allanson et al., 1991- Allanson E.
- Upadhyaya M.
- Watson G.H.
- Partington M.
- MacKenzie A.
- Lahey D.
- Huson S.M.
Watson syndrome: Is it a subtype of type 1 neurofibromatosis?.
). Treatment rests with surveillance and management of patient-specific symptoms.
LEGIUS SYNDROME
Legius syndrome (NF 1–like syndrome) is an autosomal dominant syndrome characterized by multiple CALMs, axillary freckling, macrocephaly and, in some cases, Noonan syndrome facial features (
Box 2). It is caused by pathogenic mutations in
SPRED1, located on chromosome band 15q14, which provides instructions for making the Spred-1 protein that regulates the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway involved in cell proliferation, differentiation, cell movement, and apoptosis. It remains unclear how
SPRED1 mutations cause the signs and symptoms associated with Legius syndrome (
). Because some affected individuals are likely misdiagnosed with NF 1 (5% meet NF 1 diagnostic criteria), the incidence for Legius syndrome is unknown (
).
BOX 2Facial features suggestive of Noonan syndromeHypertelorism
Flat nasal bridge
Downward slanting palpebral fissures
Ptosis
Low-set posteriorally rotated ears, thickened helices
Thin lips
Short/broad/webbed neck, redundant nuchal skin
Although some individuals meet clinical diagnostic criteria for NF 1, over time those with Legius syndrome do not develop other symptoms consistent with NF 1 such as Lisch nodules, optic pathway gliomas, neurofibromas, tibial dysplasia, or central nervous system tumors, which differentiates these two conditions later in life (
). Most have average intelligence levels, but some individuals with Legius syndrome have learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder, or attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (
). Learning problems in children with Legius syndrome are less severe than in those with NF 1 (
Denayer et al., 2011- Denayer E.
- Chrmara M.
- Breams H.
- Kievit A.M.
- van Bever Y.
- Van den Ouweland A.M.W.
- Legius E.
Legius syndrome in fourteen families.
). Physical examination of the parent may help differentiate between NF 1 and Legius syndromes, but in sporadic cases, ongoing evaluation and molecular testing may be required to confirm the diagnosis (
).
Management through childhood replicates that of NF1. To differentiate between NF1 and Legius syndrome in prepubertal individuals with multiple CALMs and intertriginous freckling when the diagnosis remains unclear, genetic testing can be performed. Those with a confirmed diagnosis of Legius syndrome do not require brain and spine MRI or ophthalmologic examinations like those with NF 1.
NOONAN SYNDROME WITH MULTIPLE LENTIGINES
Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines (formerly referred to as
LEOPARD syndrome) is an autosomal dominant RASopathy that presents with CALMs that are often dark brown (café noir macules) coupled with lentigines (
Figure 3) characterized by irregular borders, small size (<0.5 cm), and carrying shades of brown and black. The incidence of the condition is unknown, and to date, approximately 200 cases have been reported worldwide (
). This genetic condition is caused by a pathogenic variant in one of four genes (
BRAF, MAP2K1, PTPN11, and
RAF1;
), and genetic testing to confirm the diagnosis is recommended.
In addition to multiple lentigines and facial features similar to Noonan syndrome (
Box 2), other findings of Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigines include pulmonic stenosis; abnormal genitalia; growth retardation (25%); sensorineural deafness (25%); and skeletal conditions including pectus carinatum and excavatum, scoliosis, scapular winging, syndactyly, and joint hypermobility. Approximately 30% of affected individuals have learning difficulties, but intellectual disability is rare (
).
Those with a confirmed or suspected diagnosis require cardiac surveillance including echocardiogram, to assess for cardiac problems such as pulmonic stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and electrocardiogram, to monitor for arrhythmias such as right bundle branch block and other conduction abnormalities. Growth, learning, and hearing (annually) must also be closely monitored and problems addressed as needed (
).
MCCUNE–ALBRIGHT SYNDROME
McCune–Albright syndrome is a rare genetic condition with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 100,000 to 1,000,000 individuals worldwide (
,
). It is not inherited but, rather, results from a pathogenic mutation in the
GNAS gene during early embryonic postzygotic development that results in mosaicism. The presentation and severity of the condition is highly variable and depends on the number and distribution of affected cells with the changed gene (
,
) ranging from asymptomatic to incidental findings to neonatal lethality (
). Café au lait macules appear at birth or shortly thereafter and are typically irregularly bordered (Coast of Maine) and appear unilaterally after embryonic cell migration along the lines of Blaschko (
Figure 2). Its classical presentation is a triad of CALMs, fibrous dysplasia of the bone, and precocious puberty, but over time, several endocrinopathies have also been recognized.
Although McCune–Albright syndrome is typically identified through dermatologic findings, this condition also affects the skeleton and endocrine tissues. Fibrous dysplasia, a condition in which bone is replaced with fibrous tissue, typically manifests the first few years of life and predisposes affected individuals to fractures, uneven growth, and resulting deformity. Any bones in the body may be affected. The extent of disease may range from an isolated finding (monostotic lesion) to severe, polyostotic disease of the entire skeleton, appearing in a mosaic pattern similar to the skin. There is no association between the size of the CALMs, extent of disease, or location of fibrous dysplasia (
). Skull and facial bone lesions can cause asymmetric facial growth and deformity; uneven long bone growth can result in gait disturbances, limping, and loss of mobility; and asymmetric growth of vertebrae can result in scoliosis. The skull and proximal femurs are most commonly affected.
Although McCune–Albright syndrome is typically identified through dermatologic findings, this condition also affects the skeleton and endocrine tissues.
Endocrine problems associated with McCune–Albright syndrome occur in both females and males and include precocious puberty and hyperthyroidism. The presentation of precocious puberty in females is highly variable and unpredictable. Girls may present with gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty caused by recurrent estrogen-producing ovarian cysts, vaginal bleeding as young 2 years of age, breast tissue development, and enhanced growth and bone age (
,
Corica et al., 2018- Corica D.
- Aversa T.
- Pepe G.
- De Luca F.
- Wasniewska M.
Peculiarities of precocious puberty in boys and girls with McCune-Albright syndrome.
). Biochemical findings include high estradiol levels and diminished gonadotropins. Although rare in males, signs of precocious puberty result from autonomous testosterone production and include macroorchidism with or without signs of sexual precocity. Testicular lesions in the presence or absence of gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty may occur (
Corica et al., 2018- Corica D.
- Aversa T.
- Pepe G.
- De Luca F.
- Wasniewska M.
Peculiarities of precocious puberty in boys and girls with McCune-Albright syndrome.
).
Individuals develop thyroid lesions with or without autoimmune hyperthyroidism, and there is also risk for growth hormone excess, which may lead to acromegaly and coarse facial features. Of note, enhanced growth hormone increases the effects of polyostotic fibrous dysplasia. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23)–mediated phosphate wasting with or without hypophosphatemia can also be present, exacerbating the effect of fibrous dysplasia. Infrequently, the adrenal glands can be affected, resulting in neonatal hypercortisolism (Cushing syndrome), typically before age 2 years (
,
).
Although genetic testing for McCune–Albright syndrome is available, the mosaic nature of the disease makes traditional leukocyte testing less than ideal. For example, in those with only monostatic fibrous dysplasia, targeted molecular testing (sequencing of
GNAS exons 8 and 9) of the affected tissue is necessary to identify a pathogenic variant in
GNAS with a sensitivity of 80% in lesional tissue compared with 20% to 30% in peripheral blood lymphocytes (
). Although no formal diagnostic criteria have been established, most individuals with McCune–Albright syndrome receive a clinical diagnosis based on the presence of two or more physical findings.
Individualized management rests with clinical presentation, meticulous surveillance, and a multidisciplinary approach to treatment to optimize function and minimize morbidity. Surveillance by an endocrinologist includes close monitoring of infants for signs of hypercortisolism. This is followed by monitoring growth and growth acceleration (bone age), assessing for signs of precocious puberty, and initiating medical treatment as indicated. Males must be followed for testicular lesions on physical examination and ultrasonography, and females require more stringent breast cancer screening. Children younger than 5 years of age require close monitoring for thyroid abnormalities including periodic ultrasonography and thyroid function studies. Treatment may include thyroidectomy (
).
Skeletal surveillance includes monitoring for progressive scoliosis and radiographs to identify and monitor new lesions of fibrous dysplasia. Phosphorus and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels should be followed. Those with craniofacial fibrous dysplasia require annual vision and hearing screening, periodic computerized tomography scan of the skull, and serum insulin-like growth factor 1 levels through adolescence (
).
The prognosis for individuals with McCune–Albright syndrome depends on the location, extent, and severity of cell distribution (
,
). Of note, upper gastrointestinal polyps are now considered a common finding (
Wood et al., 2017- Wood L.D.
- Noë M.
- Hackeng W.
- Brosens L.A.
- Bhaijee F.
- Debeljak M.
- Montgomery E.A.
Patients with McCune-Albright syndrome have a broad spectrum of abnormalities in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas.
), and appropriate surveillance should be provided. Because McCune–Albright syndrome is caused by a de novo mutation that takes place after conception, there is no increased risk versus the general population the parents of an affected child to have another child with this condition. If the affected individual has the mutation in his/her sperm or eggs, each cell would inherit this change, making the embryo nonviable. In the absence of this, the condition is not passed to the offspring of affected individuals.
RING CHROMOSOME SYNDROMES
Ring chromosomes are aberrant chromosomes that occur when genetic material on the telomeres on both ends of a chromosome is lost, allowing the ends to stick together, forming a ring. Although extremely rare, ring chromosomes have been identified in all human chromosomes. They can be inherited, but most are sporadic (99%). The larger the chromosome, the more unstable it is. Symptoms result not from formation of the ring itself but, rather, the location and degree of telomeric deletion and lost genetic material when the ring is formed. Patient phenotype varies depending on these factors. The most uniform feature of ring chromosomes syndromes is marked growth delay (
Yip, 2015Autosomal ring chromosomes in human genetic disorders.
).
Hyperpigmentation and CALMs are rare in individuals with ring chromosomes, but multiple CALMs have been reported in individuals with ring chromosome syndrome involving chromosomes 7, 11, 12, 15, and 17 (
,
,
,
,
;
). More specifically, 30% of individuals with deletion of distal chromosome arm 15q secondary to a ring chromosome have CALMs (
Morava et al., 2003- Morava E.
- Bartsch O.
- Czako M.
- Frensel A.
- Kárteszi J.
- Kosztolányi G.Y.
A girl with cutaneous hyperpigmentation, café au lait spots and ring chromosome 15 without significant deletion.
), and in addition to CALMs, ring chromosome 7 is also associated with nevus flammeus and dark pigmented nevi (
Lange et al., 2015- Lange R.
- Von Linsingen C.
- Mata F.
- Moraes A.B.
- Arruda M.
- Neto L.V.
Endocrine abnormalities in ring chromosome 11: A case report and review of the literature.
). Individuals with CALMs associated with ring chromosome abnormalities may also have patchy hypopigmented areas suggestive of cytogenetic mosaicism (
Figure 4b). Karyotype will confirm the diagnosis, and treatment rests with symptom- and condition-specific management.
CONSTITUTIONAL MISMATCH REPAIR DEFICIENCY
Constitutional mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (CMMRD) is an autosomal recessive condition that results from pathogenic variants in MMR genes (
MLH1, MSH2 [including methylation due to an
EPCAM deletion],
MSH6, and
PMS2) associated with Lynch syndrome (
Box 3;
Wimmer et al., 2014- Wimmer K.
- Kratz C.P.
- Vasen H.F.A.
- Colas C.
- Entz-Werle N.
- Gerdes A.M.
EU-Consortium Care for CMMRD
Diagnostic criteria for constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome: Suggestions of the European consortium ‘care for CMMRD’ (C4CMMRD).
). Typically, individuals with germline
MLH1 or
MSH2 defects develop MMR-deficient cancers in their 40s to 50s, and those with
MSH6 or
PMS2 mutations are affected less consistently. Individuals with biallelic germline mutations in MMR genes, however, have CMMRD (
Bodo et al., 2015- Bodo S.
- Colas C.
- Buhard O.
- Collura A.
- Tinat J.
- Lavoine N.
- Duval A.
Diagnosis of constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome based on microsatellite instability and lymphocyte tolerance to methylating agents.
).
BOX 3Lynch syndromeLynch syndrome (also called hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer) is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome. Heterozygous (monoallelic) germline mutations in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2 (including methylation due to an EPCAM deletion), MSH6 and PMS2 increase the risk of developing Lynch syndrome. The most common mutations are MSH1 and MLH2, which account for approximately 90% of mutations, but not all who inherit the changed gene will develop cancer. Inheriting one of these genetic changes, however, increases the lifetime risk cancer, especially colorectal (40%–82%) and stomach (1%–13%), as well as gastrointestinal tract (small intestine, pancreas, liver, gallbladder ducts), upper urinary tract, brain (glioblastomas), and skin cancers (keratoacanthomas and sebaceous adenomas). For women, there is increased risk of ovarian (4%–12%) and endometrial (25%–60%) cancers. Lifetime cancer risk is lower for individuals with MSH6 and PMS2 mutations. There are several published diagnostic criteria such as the Amsterdam criteria and/or Bethesda guidelines, but they are limited in their sensitivity. A multigene panel that includes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and EPCAM deletion, along with other genes of interest, is recommended to establish a diagnosis.
References: Aarnio et al., 1999- Aarnio M.
- Sankila R.
- Pukkala E.
- Salovaara R.
- Aaltonen L.A.
- de la Chapelle A.
- Järvinen H.J.
Cancer risk in mutation carriers of DNA-mismatch-repair genes.
;
Carethers and Stoffel, 2015- Carethers J.M.
- Stoffel E.M.
Lynch syndrome and Lynch syndrome mimics: The growing complex landscape of hereditary colon cancer.
;
.
Although areas of skin hypopigmentation have been reported, most individuals with CMMRD present with CALMs (
Figure 4). The clinical presentation is variable and may include skinfold freckling, Lisch nodules, neurofibromas, and tibial pseudarthrosis, making differentiation between NF 1 and CMMRD difficult (
Hampel et al., 2015- Hampel H.
- Bennett R.L.
- Buchanan A.
- Pearlman R.
- Wiesner G.L.
A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: Referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment.
). There is phenotypic overlap with other cancer syndromes, and there are no equivocal diagnostic features of CMMRD. Thus, this syndrome is likely to go unrecognized by clinicians, and subsequently, its incidence underreported (
Bodo et al., 2015- Bodo S.
- Colas C.
- Buhard O.
- Collura A.
- Tinat J.
- Lavoine N.
- Duval A.
Diagnosis of constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome based on microsatellite instability and lymphocyte tolerance to methylating agents.
). There are reports suggesting that CALMs associated with CMMRD vary in pigmentation, have irregular borders, and may display a segmental distribution not characteristic of NF 1 (
Wimmer et al., 2014- Wimmer K.
- Kratz C.P.
- Vasen H.F.A.
- Colas C.
- Entz-Werle N.
- Gerdes A.M.
EU-Consortium Care for CMMRD
Diagnostic criteria for constitutional mismatch repair deficiency syndrome: Suggestions of the European consortium ‘care for CMMRD’ (C4CMMRD).
).
In contrast to NF 1, individuals with CMMRD develop childhood cancers, including Lynch syndrome-associated cancers (colorectal tumors and multiple intestinal polyps), hematologic malignancies, brain/central nervous system tumors, and embryonic tumors and rhabdomyosarcoma different than those with NF 1 (
). Additionally, most parents of children with CMMRD are consanguineous. One or both parents may have no clinical findings of NF 1, but there may be a family history (first- or second-degree relatives) of Lynch syndrome (
Bodo et al., 2015- Bodo S.
- Colas C.
- Buhard O.
- Collura A.
- Tinat J.
- Lavoine N.
- Duval A.
Diagnosis of constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome based on microsatellite instability and lymphocyte tolerance to methylating agents.
,
). This rate is low, and individuals with CMMRD do not always have a family history of cancer (
Bodo et al., 2015- Bodo S.
- Colas C.
- Buhard O.
- Collura A.
- Tinat J.
- Lavoine N.
- Duval A.
Diagnosis of constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome based on microsatellite instability and lymphocyte tolerance to methylating agents.
,
Hampel et al., 2015- Hampel H.
- Bennett R.L.
- Buchanan A.
- Pearlman R.
- Wiesner G.L.
A practice guideline from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the National Society of Genetic Counselors: Referral indications for cancer predisposition assessment.
).
Even though causative genes for CMMRD are known, genetic screening is not informative for 30% of patients for whom testing shows variants of uncertain significance. Additionally, testing for
PMS2 (responsible for 60% of CMMRD) is complicated by pseudogenes, which results in a lack of sensitivity with mutation analysis only. Therefore, although mutation testing for CMMRD is possible, it is far from straightforward (
Bodo et al., 2015- Bodo S.
- Colas C.
- Buhard O.
- Collura A.
- Tinat J.
- Lavoine N.
- Duval A.
Diagnosis of constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome based on microsatellite instability and lymphocyte tolerance to methylating agents.
).
Because of the increased risk for neoplasia and early-age onset of cancers, treatment rests with meticulous tumor screening to ensure early detection and treatment to improve patient outcome. Although there are no established standardized screening criteria, proposed guidelines published in 2017 recommend the following surveillance: (a) cranial ultrasound at 6 months of age until the fontanel is closed, followed by brain MRI every 6 months starting at 2 years; (b) complete blood count every 6 months beginning at 1 year of age; (c) colonoscopy annually beginning at age 6 years; (d) upper endoscopy and video capsule endoscopy annually beginning at 8 years; (e) urinalysis annually beginning at age 10 years; and (f) for women, pelvic examination with endometrial sampling annually beginning at age 20 years. Total body MRI has been suggested for screening, but the recommendation regarding this remains uncertain (
Durno et al., 2017- Durno C.
- Boland R.
- Cohen S.
- Dominitz J.A.
- Giardiello F.M.
- Johnson D.A.
- Rex D.K.
Recommendations on surveillance and management of biallelic mismatch repair deficiency (BMMRD) syndrome: A consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.
).
Article info
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest: None to report.
Copyright
Copyright © 2019 by the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.