Journal of Pediatric Health Care
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 141-142 , May 2010

Accept or Reject?

  • Sarah A. Martin, MS, RN, CPNP-PC/AC

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Sarah A. Martin, MS, RN, CPNP-PC/AC, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Memorial Hospital, 2300 Children's Plaza Box #63, Chicago, IL 60614-3363

References 

  1. Baggs, J. G., Broome, M. E., Dougherty, M. C., Freda, M. C., & Kearney, M. H. (2008). Blinding in peer review: The preferences of reviewers for nursing journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 4, 131-138.
  2. Broome, M. E., Dougherty, M., Kearney, M., Freda, M., & Baggs, J. (2009, September). Ethical concerns of nursing journal reviewers: An international survey. Paper presented at the Sixth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, Vancouver, BC, Canada. Abstract retrieved from http://www.ama-assn.org/public/peer/abstracts_2009.html
  3. Kearney MH, Baggs JG, Broome ME, Dougherty MC, Freda MC. Experience, time investment, and motivators of nursing journal peer reviewers. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2008;40:395–400
  4. Peer review. (n.d.). In Merriam-Webster's online dictionary (11th ed.). Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/peer review
  5. Ware, M. & Monkman, M. (2008). Publishing Research Consortium. Peer review: Benefits, perceptions, and alternatives. Retrieved from http://www.publishingresearch.net/PeerReview.htm

PII: S0891-5245(10)00024-6

doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2010.01.004

Journal of Pediatric Health Care
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 141-142 , May 2010