Journal Home
Search for

Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages 303-309 (September 2009)


View previous. 20 of 28 View next.

Developmental Status of Children of Teen Mothers: Contrasting Objective Assessments With Maternal Reports

Patricia Ryan-Krause, MS, RN, MSN, CPNPCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Mikki Meadows-Oliver, PhD, RN, CPNP, Lois Sadler, PhD, APRN-BC, PNP, Martha K. Swartz, PhD, RN, CPNP, FAAN

published online 22 December 2008.

Abstract 

Introduction

Descriptive study compared adolescent mothers' subjective perceptions of their children's development with objective developmental assessments.

Methods

A volunteer sample of mother/child pairs was recruited from an urban high school. Thirty-three mothers completed the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (A&SQ). The Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) was administered to children.

Results

On the BSID, group mean scores all fell within the normal range. However, almost 20% of individual children had one or more delays. Almost 73% of mothers accurately assessed their children's development on the A&SQ when compared with BSID results. Eighteen percent of mothers suspected delays when no delays were objectively identified. A single mother identified delay in a different domain than that identified on the BSID.

Discussion

Findings that almost 20% of these children had developmental delays support other research that children of adolescent mothers are at risk for delays. Findings that teen mothers varied in their abilities to assess their children's development reinforce the need for education of teen mothers about child development. Further study is needed to determine the best models of this education in school and community settings.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Patricia Ryan-Krause, MS, RN, MSN, CPNP, Yale University School of Nursing, 100 Church St South, PO Box 9740, New Haven, CT 06536-0740

 Research support provided by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1R15HD39170-01).

PII: S0891-5245(08)00273-3

doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2008.09.001


View previous. 20 of 28 View next.