Journal Home
Search for

Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 216-221 (July 2009)


View previous. 12 of 19 View next.

Do Parents Accurately Perceive Their Child's Weight Status?

Angela De La O, MD, Kristine C. Jordan, PhD, MPH, RD, Karen Ortiz, MD, Laurie J. Moyer-Mileur, PhD, RD, Greg Stoddard, MS, Mike Friedrichs, MS, Rachel Cox, RD, Emily C. Carlson, BS, CHES, Elizabeth Heap, RN, BSN, Nicole L. Mihalopoulos, MD, MPHCorresponding Author Informationemail address

published online 27 February 2008.

Abstract 

Introduction

Few studies have evaluated the accuracy of parental perceptions of their child's weight status.

Methods

A cross-sectional sample of children aged 5 to 12 years and their parents (n = 576 parent-child pairs) was enrolled from four schools. Child height and weight were measured. The parents classified their child on Likert scales ranging from “extremely overweight” to “extremely underweight.” Parental perceptions were compared with their child's weight status according to body mass index (BMI) age-gender percentiles. Fisher-Halton-Freeman tests, χ2, and logistic regression were used to compare demographic factors between parents who inaccurately estimated and those who accurately estimated child weight status.

Results

Misclassification occurred 25% of the time (95% confidence interval: 21.4–28.5). All parents of children with a BMI greater than or equal to the 95th percentile classified their child in a category other than “extremely overweight,” and 75% of children with a BMI from the 85th to less than the 95th percentile were misclassified as “about right” or “underweight.” Boys were more likely to be misclassified than were girls (29% vs 21%, P = .03).

Conclusions

The majority of parents of obese and overweight children underestimate their child's weight status. Parents of boys are more likely to perceive their child's weight incorrectly.

Corresponding Author InformationCorrespondence: Nicole L. Mihalopoulos, MD, MPH, Department of Pediatrics, 50 N Medical Dr, 2A200 SOM, Salt Lake City, UT 84132.

PII: S0891-5245(08)00002-3

doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2007.12.014


View previous. 12 of 19 View next.